![]() ![]() but being able to work on a part and basically "spin the wheel" to "see what it sounds like with this or that" is really amazing. Now, in the end, I would likely end up using higher end reverbs and delays and such. I brought up a dry track, set it up to loop, and then just went on an adventure in Native selecting amps and effects and adjusting mic placement and and and and. I guess I'm most excited for my next recording project because of the proof-of-concept that led me to post about this here. You can jump in and start recording, or as many have, dive in and record and produce Emmy and Grammy-winning works of art. I just had to look it up in one of Anderton's books, or later hit up the forums. ![]() Cakewalk had that functionality to pull it off. But, there have been many times when something came up, and sure enough. Honestly, after all these years, I haven't tapped into all the features ever. (watching anyone under the age of 30 frantically typing DOS and 386 machines into google).Ĭakewalk may not be for the timid, but trust me. I was recording 8 tracks CD-quality audio on a 386 machine. While known for quirks, to be honest, those quirks were generally configuration issues. I've been using Sonar since the Cakewalk days. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |